IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L).
IUMO.L and CNX1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUMO.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Momentum Index. It was launched on Feb 21, 2018. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both IUMO.L and CNX1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMO.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | -2.64% | 17.81% | 31.88% | 9.83% | -18.15% | 12.60% | 29.61% | 28.49% | -3.73% | 37.07% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -5.29% | 19.98% | 26.37% | 55.50% | -33.49% | 28.32% | 47.63% | 38.99% | -1.30% | 31.56% |
Different Trading Currencies
IUMO.L is traded in USD, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMO.L achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly higher than CNX1.L's -5.29% return.
IUMO.L
- 1D
- 5.02%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CNX1.L
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- YTD
- -5.29%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMO.L
CNX1.L
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMO.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.23 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.82 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.12 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | 7.74 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMO.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.23 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.98 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMO.L and CNX1.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUMO.L nor CNX1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, roughly equal to the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMO.L and CNX1.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMO.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.75% | -27.56% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | -11.03% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.98% | -27.56% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -8.21% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -4.61% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 3.68% | -1.06% |
Volatility
IUMO.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) at 5.71%. This indicates that IUMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IUMO.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 5.71% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 11.91% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.75% | 19.90% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 20.57% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 19.88% | +0.48% |