PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
-8.15%19.83%18.44%
EXUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD
-0.98%31.98%1.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a -8.15% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.L's -0.98% return.


XNAS.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
-8.15%
6M
-4.86%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
10Y*

EXUS.L

1D
0.51%
1M
-9.67%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
4.78%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EXUS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAS.L
XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EXUS.L
EXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNAS.LEXUS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.44

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

1.95

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.05

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.61

7.82

-1.21

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.L and EXUS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNAS.LEXUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.44

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.97

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.L and EXUS.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNAS.L nor EXUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than EXUS.L's maximum drawdown of -12.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and EXUS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XNAS.LEXUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-12.85%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-10.74%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.47%

-9.67%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-2.33%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.82%

+0.19%

Volatility

XNAS.L vs. EXUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) is 4.93%, while Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that XNAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XNAS.LEXUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

7.08%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

10.31%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

16.03%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

14.81%

+4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

14.81%

+4.54%