XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and XUHC.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while XUHC.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAS.DE returned 15.95%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for XUHC.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUHC.DE.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly higher than XUHC.DE's 7.46% return.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.95%
- 10Y*
- —
XUHC.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 24.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 17.93% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 31.23% |
XUHC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | 7.46% | 1.47% | 8.80% | -1.46% | 2.49% | 28.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and XUHC.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.38 |
The correlation between XNAS.DE and XUHC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
XUHC.DE
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNAS.DE | XUHC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.19 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 5.37 | +2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than XUHC.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and XUHC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | XUHC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -26.86% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -11.18% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -22.18% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | -22.18% | -9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -1.53% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -6.32% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 4.56% | -1.07% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE) at 5.34%. This indicates that XNAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUHC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | XUHC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 5.34% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 11.00% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 15.17% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 14.59% | +5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 17.07% | +2.85% |
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XUHC.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Dividend Comparison
XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUHC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUHC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.63% | 0.82% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.DE and XUHC.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUHC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XUHC.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while XUHC.DE tracks MSCI USA Health Care. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.12% for XUHC.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and XUHC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer