XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and XDRE.DE (Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while XDRE.DE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Developed Green Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XNAS.DE returned 36.43% vs 17.57% for XDRE.DE. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XDRE.DE.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 19.94% return, which is significantly higher than XDRE.DE's 13.27% return.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 19.94%
- 6M
- 20.20%
- 1Y
- 36.43%
- 3Y*
- 24.62%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- —
XDRE.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.94% | 7.11% | 4.35% |
XDRE.DE Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 13.27% | -2.46% | -3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and XDRE.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
XDRE.DE
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNAS.DE | XDRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.60 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 8.91 | +1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than XDRE.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and XDRE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | XDRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -20.91% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -6.79% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | 0.00% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -7.93% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 1.99% | +1.44% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) at 3.67%. This indicates that XNAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDRE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | XDRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 3.67% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 8.99% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 11.63% | +5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 14.06% | +5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 14.06% | +5.85% |
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDRE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.DE nor XDRE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.DE and XDRE.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDRE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDRE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XDRE.DE is REIT. XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while XDRE.DE tracks Dow Jones Developed Green Real Estate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.18% for XDRE.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and XDRE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer