PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JURE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNAS.DE is traded in EUR, while JURE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JURE.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than JURE.L's 10.73% return.


XNAS.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
9.23%
YTD
20.53%
6M
19.39%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*

JURE.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.69%
YTD
10.73%
6M
11.01%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
20.53%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%33.56%
JURE.L
JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
10.73%2.73%33.30%23.91%-14.11%37.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.DE and JURE.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.86

The correlation between XNAS.DE and JURE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

JURE.L
JURE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JURE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JURE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JURE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JURE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JURE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JURE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNAS.DEJURE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

3.58

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

13.63

-2.47

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the JURE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.DE and JURE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNAS.DEJURE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.24

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.97

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.92

-0.01

Drawdowns

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, smaller than the maximum JURE.L drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and JURE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNAS.DEJURE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.25%

-33.49%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-6.87%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-22.87%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.25%

-22.87%

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.43%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-4.45%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

1.81%

+1.57%

Volatility

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JURE.L) at 2.07%. This indicates that XNAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JURE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNAS.DEJURE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

2.07%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

7.23%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

11.01%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

15.21%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

17.26%

+2.58%

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XNAS.DE and JURE.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNAS.DE vs. JURE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNAS.DE nor JURE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNAS.DE and JURE.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNAS.DE and JURE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JURE.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while JURE.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and JURE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer