PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Premium Income UCITS ETF (JGPI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than JGPI.DE's 0.57% return.


XNAS.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.84%
YTD
20.53%
6M
22.04%
1Y
39.25%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*

JGPI.DE

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.61%
YTD
0.57%
6M
1.14%
1Y
2.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
20.53%7.11%33.75%2.54%
JGPI.DE
JPMorgan Global Equity Premium Income UCITS ETF
0.57%-0.67%14.32%-1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.DE and JGPI.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2023

0.17

The correlation between XNAS.DE and JGPI.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

JGPI.DE
JGPI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
JGPI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGPI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGPI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
JGPI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGPI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Premium Income UCITS ETF (JGPI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNAS.DEJGPI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.04

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

0.25

+3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

0.70

+10.46

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the JGPI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.DE and JGPI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than JGPI.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and JGPI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNAS.DEJGPI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.25%

-12.12%

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-9.09%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-7.40%

+6.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-4.47%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.18%

+0.20%

Volatility

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Premium Income UCITS ETF (JGPI.DE) at 3.58%. This indicates that XNAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGPI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNAS.DEJGPI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

3.58%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

7.09%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

10.07%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

10.37%

+9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

10.37%

+9.48%

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JGPI.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNAS.DE vs. JGPI.DE - Dividend Comparison

XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JGPI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.


PositionTTM20252024
JGPI.DE
JPMorgan Global Equity Premium Income UCITS ETF
8.18%8.08%6.27%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNAS.DE and JGPI.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JGPI.DE.

XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JGPI.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.35% for JGPI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and JGPI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer