XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and IUSN.DE (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while IUSN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAS.DE returned 18.79%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for IUSN.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IUSN.DE.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than IUSN.DE's 16.07% return.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 22.04%
- 1Y
- 39.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSN.DE
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 31.23% |
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 16.07% | 7.76% | 13.17% | 13.12% | -13.76% | 17.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and IUSN.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XNAS.DE and IUSN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
IUSN.DE
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNAS.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 4.42 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 16.61 | -5.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, smaller than the maximum IUSN.DE drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and IUSN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -40.27% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -7.12% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -24.25% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | -24.25% | -7.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | 0.00% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -7.00% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 1.90% | +1.48% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) at 3.90%. This indicates that XNAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.90% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 9.79% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 13.88% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 16.56% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 18.31% | +1.54% |
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSN.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.DE nor IUSN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.DE and IUSN.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IUSN.DE is Global Equities. XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while IUSN.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and IUSN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer