XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. XNAS.DE is passively managed, while FTGQ.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, XNAS.DE returned 37.85% vs 16.15% for FTGQ.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FTGQ.DE.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than FTGQ.DE's 7.60% return.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.23%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 19.39%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | -1.01% |
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 7.60% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and FTGQ.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XNAS.DE and FTGQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
FTGQ.DE
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 4.23 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 11.47 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.86 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.25 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than FTGQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and FTGQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -19.13% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -3.80% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.17% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -5.88% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 1.41% | +1.97% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) at 1.30%. This indicates that XNAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 1.30% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 5.09% | +5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 8.64% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 12.69% | +7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 12.69% | +7.15% |
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGQ.DE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.DE nor FTGQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.DE and FTGQ.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and FTGQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer