XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while DBXD.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAS.DE returned 18.79%/yr vs 9.16%/yr for DBXD.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DBXD.DE.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than DBXD.DE's 1.35% return.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 37.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 33.56% |
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 19.60% | -12.74% | 16.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and DBXD.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XNAS.DE and DBXD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
DBXD.DE
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.04 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 0.19 | +3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 0.58 | +10.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 0.14 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.53 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.31 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, smaller than the maximum DBXD.DE drawdown of -54.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and DBXD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -54.98% | +23.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -12.28% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -15.92% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | -26.70% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -2.23% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -11.34% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.97% | -0.59% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) is 4.31%, while Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that XNAS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 5.10% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 12.95% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 16.13% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 17.16% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 18.35% | +1.49% |
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXD.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.DE nor DBXD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.DE and DBXD.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DBXD.DE is Europe Equities. XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while DBXD.DE tracks DAX®. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.09% for DBXD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and DBXD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer