XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and XYLD.L (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while XYLD.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAQ.L returned 17.09%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for XYLD.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAQ.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XYLD.L.

Performance

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XNAQ.L is traded in GBP, while XYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAQ.L achieves a 17.71% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD.L's 2.99% return.

XNAQ.L

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 17.71%
• 6M: 17.47%
• 1Y: 36.49%
• 3Y*: 24.50%
• 5Y*: 17.09%
• 10Y*: —

XYLD.L

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 7.57%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: 2.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	17.71%	11.72%	28.64%	47.82%	-25.44%	-8.88%
XYLD.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D	2.99%	-1.36%	6.72%	0.43%	2.18%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAQ.L and XYLD.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021	0.12

Return for Risk

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAQ.L

XNAQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XNAQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
XNAQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XNAQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

XYLD.L

XYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNAQ.L	XYLD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.20	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	1.74	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.21	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	1.51	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	4.29	+5.24

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAQ.L and XYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAQ.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than XYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAQ.L and XYLD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNAQ.L	XYLD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	-15.49%	-18.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.99%	-5.01%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.55%	-8.75%	-15.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.52%	-15.49%	-12.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-2.38%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.59%	-5.17%	-8.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	1.76%	+2.06%

Volatility

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) at 1.54%. This indicates that XNAQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNAQ.L	XYLD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	1.54%	+4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	4.85%	+6.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	6.32%	+9.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.69%	8.24%	+15.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.95%	9.27%	+16.68%

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD.L's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XNAQ.L vs. XYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

XNAQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D	3.76%	3.61%	3.34%	2.88%	6.03%	3.88%	3.78%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNAQ.L and XYLD.L in my portfolio?

XNAQ.L and XYLD.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XNAQ.L or XYLD.L?

On fees, XYLD.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNAQ.L or XYLD.L?

XYLD.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAQ.L.

What is the main difference between XNAQ.L and XYLD.L?

XNAQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XYLD.L is Corporate Bonds. XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while XYLD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAQ.L and 0.16% for XYLD.L.