XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L
XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAQ.L returned 17.97%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAQ.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XNAQ.L is traded in GBP, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAQ.L achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -1.83% return.
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 38.43%
- 3Y*
- 23.76%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 17.14% | 11.72% | 28.64% | 47.82% | -25.44% | -8.88% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -1.83% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAQ.L and SGLN.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021 | 0.01 |
The correlation between XNAQ.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (5 years) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNAQ.L
SGLN.L
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNAQ.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 1.13 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | 3.51 | +6.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAQ.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -53.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAQ.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAQ.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -53.23% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -22.87% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.55% | -22.87% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.52% | -22.87% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -20.64% | +17.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.67% | -24.70% | +11.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 7.37% | -3.57% |
Volatility
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) is 5.78%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that XNAQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAQ.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 6.68% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 20.78% | -9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 23.82% | -8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 21.84% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.98% | 18.84% | +7.14% |
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNAQ.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAQ.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAQ.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAQ.L.
XNAQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SGLN.L is Gold. XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAQ.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XNAQ.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer