XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L
XMWX.L (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C) and IGUS.L (iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMWX.L is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Index, while IGUS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMWX.L returned 23.79% vs 25.55% for IGUS.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMWX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IGUS.L.
Performance
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMWX.L is traded in USD, while IGUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IGUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMWX.L achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than IGUS.L's 9.56% return.
XMWX.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGUS.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 24.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XMWX.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C | 9.04% | 23.16% | -1.64% |
IGUS.L iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 9.56% | 26.25% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMWX.L and IGUS.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XMWX.L and IGUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMWX.L
IGUS.L
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMWX.L | IGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.02 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 8.01 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMWX.L | IGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.73 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.60 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMWX.L drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, smaller than the maximum IGUS.L drawdown of -43.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWX.L and IGUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMWX.L | IGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.53% | -43.75% | +31.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -12.78% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.77% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -7.80% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.23% | -0.56% |
Volatility
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) is 3.17%, while iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that XMWX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMWX.L | IGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.82% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 11.07% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 14.88% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 20.53% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 21.11% | -8.68% |
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMWX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IGUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMWX.L vs. IGUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMWX.L nor IGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMWX.L and IGUS.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMWX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMWX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGUS.L.
XMWX.L is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IGUS.L is S&P 500. XMWX.L tracks MSCI World ex USA Index, while IGUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMWX.L and 0.20% for IGUS.L.
Find the right allocation for XMWX.L and IGUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer