XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XMWX.L (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMWX.L is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Index, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMWX.L returned 22.15% vs 24.18% for EQQQ.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMWX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.

Performance

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMWX.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMWX.L achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 12.53% return.

XMWX.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.55%
• 6M: 5.91%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 1Y: 22.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EQQQ.L

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -4.31%
• 6M: 11.96%
• YTD: 12.53%
• 1Y: 24.18%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 14.66%
• 10Y*: 20.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XMWX.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C	9.73%	23.16%	-24.90%
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	12.53%	19.96%	8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XMWX.L and EQQQ.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2024	0.54

The correlation between XMWX.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMWX.L

XMWX.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
XMWX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XMWX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
XMWX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XMWX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XMWX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 18

EQQQ.L

EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMWX.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	1.41	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	2.02	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	2.18	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.31	7.39	-6.08

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMWX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMWX.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMWX.L drawdown since its inception was -29.33%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -73.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWX.L and EQQQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMWX.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.33%	-73.86%	+44.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.65%	-11.03%	-14.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.16%	-6.59%	-8.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.82%	-17.10%	-2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.90%	3.26%	+13.64%

Volatility

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) is 3.04%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that XMWX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMWX.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	6.46%	-3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	13.45%	-3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.90%	17.13%	+25.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.69%	20.77%	+15.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.69%	19.94%	+16.75%

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMWX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMWX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

XMWX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.24%	0.29%	0.38%	0.39%	0.56%	0.25%	0.41%	0.56%	0.63%	0.67%	0.77%	0.72%
XMWX.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMWX.L and EQQQ.L in my portfolio?

XMWX.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMWX.L or EQQQ.L?

On fees, XMWX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMWX.L or EQQQ.L?

XMWX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

What is the main difference between XMWX.L and EQQQ.L?

XMWX.L is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. XMWX.L tracks MSCI World ex USA Index, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMWX.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.