XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XMW.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF) and CPD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMW.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while CPD.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMW.TO returned 7.21%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for CPD.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMW.TO charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CPD.TO.

Performance

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMW.TO having a 5.56% return and CPD.TO slightly higher at 5.80%. Over the past 10 years, XMW.TO has outperformed CPD.TO with an annualized return of 7.21%, while CPD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.55% annualized return.

XMW.TO

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 3.54%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 1Y: 7.50%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 7.21%

CPD.TO

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 5.65%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 1Y: 12.28%
• 3Y*: 16.88%
• 5Y*: 6.21%
• 10Y*: 6.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF	5.56%	5.84%	20.05%	4.68%	-4.33%	12.80%	0.51%	14.74%	5.95%	10.19%
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF	5.80%	16.10%	23.31%	6.23%	-19.19%	18.85%	5.35%	3.35%	-9.05%	13.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XMW.TO and CPD.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2012	0.11

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMW.TO	CPD.TO
Technology	25.8%	-
Financial Services	13.2%	6.4%
Healthcare	13.0%	-
Communication Services	11.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	0.5%
Industrials	8.1%	-
Utilities	7.3%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	-
Energy	3.7%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMW.TO

XMW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 37
XMW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
XMW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
XMW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
XMW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XMW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

CPD.TO

CPD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CPD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CPD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CPD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMW.TO	CPD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.98	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	4.06	-2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.63	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	4.57	-2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.47	22.76	-18.29

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the CPD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMW.TO and CPD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMW.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, smaller than the maximum CPD.TO drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMW.TO and CPD.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMW.TO	CPD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.42%	-40.92%	+19.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.14%	-2.70%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.59%	-7.65%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.45%	-24.12%	+9.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.42%	-40.92%	+19.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	0.00%	-1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-6.71%	+3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	0.54%	+1.32%

Volatility

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO) at 0.70%. This indicates that XMW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMW.TO	CPD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	0.70%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.71%	2.72%	+2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.69%	4.14%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.72%	7.70%	+1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.05%	10.57%	+0.48%

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMW.TO has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than CPD.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMW.TO vs. CPD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than CPD.TO's 4.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF	4.96%	4.96%	5.11%	5.88%	5.53%	4.17%	4.96%	5.02%	4.74%	4.33%	4.85%	5.44%
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF	1.44%	1.58%	1.81%	1.98%	1.66%	1.43%	1.52%	2.20%	2.01%	1.61%	2.02%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMW.TO and CPD.TO in my portfolio?

XMW.TO and CPD.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMW.TO or CPD.TO?

On fees, XMW.TO is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMW.TO or CPD.TO?

XMW.TO is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CPD.TO.

What is the main difference between XMW.TO and CPD.TO?

XMW.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CPD.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. XMW.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while CPD.TO tracks S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for XMW.TO and 0.50% for CPD.TO.