XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO
XMW.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF) and CAGE.TO (Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XMW.TO is passively managed, while CAGE.TO is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XMW.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
CAGE.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | 2.79% |
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 11.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMW.TO and CAGE.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XMW.TO
CAGE.TO
XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) and Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMW.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMW.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 4.44 | -3.50 |
Drawdowns
XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMW.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, which is greater than CAGE.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMW.TO and CAGE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMW.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -2.93% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.96% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -0.72% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility
XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMW.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.67% | 15.75% | -8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 15.75% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 15.75% | -4.68% |
Dividends
XMW.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while CAGE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.98% | 1.66% | 1.43% | 1.52% | 2.20% | 2.01% | 1.61% | 2.02% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMW.TO and CAGE.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis.
Find the right allocation for XMW.TO and CAGE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer