XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) and MOGB.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Xtrackers and VanEck respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVU.L returned 6.51%/yr vs 3.82%/yr for MOGB.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOGB.L.

Performance

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMVU.L is traded in USD, while MOGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MOGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVU.L achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than MOGB.L's 0.58% return.

XMVU.L

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 2.61%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 6.51%
• 10Y*: —

MOGB.L

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 3.12%
• 6M: -1.33%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 1Y: 8.78%
• 3Y*: 7.95%
• 5Y*: 3.82%
• 10Y*: 7.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	2.34%	7.93%	15.69%	9.79%	-9.52%	21.61%	4.40%	27.09%	0.19%	18.46%
MOGB.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	0.58%	7.55%	11.06%	17.78%	-18.79%	26.08%	13.15%	34.83%	-1.29%	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVU.L and MOGB.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2016	0.67

The correlation between XMVU.L and MOGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVU.L

XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MOGB.L

MOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
MOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
MOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMVU.L	MOGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	0.64	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	1.04	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.11	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	0.74	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	1.88	+1.28

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the MOGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVU.L and MOGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, roughly equal to the maximum MOGB.L drawdown of -32.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVU.L and MOGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVU.L	MOGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.98%	-32.45%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.39%	-11.84%	+6.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.99%	-21.54%	+11.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	-27.95%	+10.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-1.71%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.62%	-8.83%	+5.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	4.66%	-2.91%

Volatility

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) is 2.95%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that XMVU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVU.L	MOGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	5.14%	-2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.92%	10.16%	-4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.90%	13.62%	-5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.61%	21.10%	-9.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.02%	23.64%	-10.62%

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MOGB.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMVU.L vs. MOGB.L - Dividend Comparison

XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while MOGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MOGB.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	1.18%	1.24%	1.31%	1.33%	1.82%	1.27%	1.81%	1.55%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVU.L and MOGB.L in my portfolio?

XMVU.L and MOGB.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMVU.L or MOGB.L?

On fees, XMVU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVU.L or MOGB.L?

XMVU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOGB.L.

What is the main difference between XMVU.L and MOGB.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMVU.L and 0.49% for MOGB.L.