PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMVU.L is traded in USD, while DGRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DGRP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVU.L achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than DGRP.L's 6.52% return.


XMVU.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.27%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.82%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*

DGRP.L

1D
0.27%
1M
3.37%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.06%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
2.14%7.94%15.67%9.79%-9.53%21.63%4.38%24.92%-1.18%18.48%
DGRP.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD
6.52%13.39%18.19%18.17%-8.26%25.51%13.64%30.59%-6.72%26.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVU.L and DGRP.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between XMVU.L and DGRP.L has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMVU.L
DGRP.L

Technology

29.6%
30.4%

Financial Services

13.7%
10.3%

Healthcare

12.7%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%
8.0%

Utilities

7.6%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
8.2%

Industrials

6.2%
10.9%

Communication Services

6.0%
8.4%

Energy

3.5%
5.2%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.1%

Technology

XMVU.L
29.6%
DGRP.L
30.4%

Financial Services

XMVU.L
13.7%
DGRP.L
10.3%

Healthcare

XMVU.L
12.7%
DGRP.L
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

XMVU.L
10.0%
DGRP.L
8.0%

Utilities

XMVU.L
7.6%
DGRP.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XMVU.L
6.4%
DGRP.L
8.2%

Industrials

XMVU.L
6.2%
DGRP.L
10.9%

Communication Services

XMVU.L
6.0%
DGRP.L
8.4%

Energy

XMVU.L
3.5%
DGRP.L
5.2%

Real Estate

XMVU.L
2.2%
DGRP.L

-

Basic Materials

XMVU.L
2.2%
DGRP.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVU.L
XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRP.L
DGRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DGRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMVU.LDGRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.38

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.53

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

10.68

-8.19

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the DGRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVU.L and DGRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMVU.LDGRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.14

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.86

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.97

-0.22

Drawdowns

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, which is greater than DGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -31.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVU.L and DGRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMVU.LDGRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.98%

-31.11%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-7.83%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.00%

-16.51%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-18.44%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.06%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-3.59%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.86%

-0.12%

Volatility

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L) at 1.81%. This indicates that XMVU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMVU.LDGRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

1.81%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.35%

6.72%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

9.29%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.57%

13.61%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.12%

14.86%

-1.74%

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRP.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMVU.L vs. DGRP.L - Dividend Comparison

XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than DGRP.L's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRP.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD
1.01%1.10%1.16%1.33%1.47%1.34%2.74%2.32%1.90%1.36%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
1.18%1.24%1.31%1.33%1.82%1.27%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMVU.L and DGRP.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMVU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMVU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRP.L.

XMVU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRP.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMVU.L and 0.33% for DGRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMVU.L and DGRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer