XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) and 5HEP.L (Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Xtrackers and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVU.L returned 7.23%/yr vs 2.41%/yr for 5HEP.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 5HEP.L.

Performance

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMVU.L is traded in USD, while 5HEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 5HEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVU.L achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than 5HEP.L's -1.23% return.

XMVU.L

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 4.34%
• 3Y*: 11.56%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: —

5HEP.L

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: -1.23%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: 4.24%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	2.14%	7.94%	15.67%	9.79%	-9.53%	21.63%	4.38%	24.92%	-1.38%
5HEP.L Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)	-1.23%	4.74%	3.66%	15.26%	-16.23%	22.50%	23.49%	31.20%	-8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVU.L and 5HEP.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018	0.75

The correlation between XMVU.L and 5HEP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVU.L

XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

5HEP.L

5HEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
5HEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
5HEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
5HEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
5HEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMVU.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	0.49	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.78	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.09	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	0.59	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	1.65	+0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the 5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVU.L and 5HEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMVU.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	0.49	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.15	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.48	+0.27

Drawdowns

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, roughly equal to the maximum 5HEP.L drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVU.L and 5HEP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVU.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.98%	-32.23%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.39%	-9.34%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.00%	-17.90%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.74%	-22.59%	+4.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-6.46%	+5.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-5.82%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	3.37%	-1.63%

Volatility

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) is 2.22%, while Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that XMVU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5HEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVU.L	5HEP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.22%	4.03%	-1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.35%	8.37%	-3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.67%	11.40%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.57%	15.58%	-4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	17.35%	-4.23%

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HEP.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMVU.L vs. 5HEP.L - Dividend Comparison

XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while 5HEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
5HEP.L Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	1.18%	1.24%	1.31%	1.33%	1.82%	1.27%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVU.L and 5HEP.L in my portfolio?

XMVU.L and 5HEP.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMVU.L or 5HEP.L?

On fees, XMVU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVU.L or 5HEP.L?

XMVU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEP.L.

What is the main difference between XMVU.L and 5HEP.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMVU.L and 0.75% for 5HEP.L.