XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO
XMV.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF) and QDX.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMV.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while QDX.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMV.TO returned 11.25%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for QDX.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMV.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for QDX.TO.
Performance
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMV.TO achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than QDX.TO's 11.04% return.
XMV.TO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
QDX.TO
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- —
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMV.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF | 8.91% | 17.87% | 15.63% | 10.94% | -1.64% | 21.41% | -1.75% | 23.41% | -4.14% |
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 11.04% | 25.29% | 12.93% | 13.66% | -8.61% | 11.24% | 5.06% | 15.27% | -8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMV.TO and QDX.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018 | 0.43 |
The correlation between XMV.TO and QDX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Energy
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Industrials
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Basic Materials
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Consumer Defensive
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Utilities
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Communication Services
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Technology
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Real Estate
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
Healthcare
XMV.TO
-
QDX.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XMV.TO
QDX.TO
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMV.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.23 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 8.72 | +1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMV.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.70 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.83 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.57 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMV.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, which is greater than QDX.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMV.TO and QDX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMV.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -28.08% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -10.88% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -14.25% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.57% | -23.00% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -4.54% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.78% | -1.12% |
Volatility
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV.TO) is 2.41%, while Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that XMV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMV.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 4.67% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 12.02% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.34% | 14.29% | -4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 13.94% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 15.48% | -2.54% |
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMV.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than QDX.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMV.TO vs. QDX.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than QDX.TO's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.61% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.25% | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMV.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.33% | 2.62% | 2.41% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.44% | 2.93% | 2.49% | 2.11% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMV.TO and QDX.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XMV.TO.
XMV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while QDX.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XMV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XMV.TO and 0.17% for QDX.TO.
Find the right allocation for XMV.TO and QDX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer