XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO
XMV.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF) and PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMV.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while PDC.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMV.TO returned 9.95%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for PDC.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMV.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDC.TO.
Performance
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMV.TO achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 26.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XMV.TO has underperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 9.95%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.
XMV.TO
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 18.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.61%
PDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 1Y
- 38.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.46K | CA$67.75K | CA$95.06K | |
| CA$225.31K | CA$221.10K | CA$544.03K |
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMV.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF | 13.16% | 17.98% | 15.85% | 11.14% | -1.46% | 21.73% | -1.41% | 23.69% | -7.37% | 7.14% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 26.09% | 21.80% | 16.38% | 6.97% | -4.17% | 30.14% | -5.48% | 25.00% | -11.85% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMV.TO and PDC.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012 | 0.59 |
The correlation between XMV.TO and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.77 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Energy
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Industrials
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Defensive
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Basic Materials
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Utilities
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Communication Services
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Technology
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Real Estate
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
Healthcare
XMV.TO
-
PDC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XMV.TO
PDC.TO
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMV.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.89 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 10.03 | -6.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.39 | 36.85 | -25.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMV.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMV.TO and PDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMV.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -41.93% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -3.86% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.72% | -10.52% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.56% | -17.98% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.65% | -41.93% | +3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.33% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -4.48% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.05% | +0.61% |
Volatility
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) have volatilities of 2.39% and 2.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMV.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 2.41% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 6.51% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 8.58% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 10.83% | +6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.69% | 15.28% | +12.41% |
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMV.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than PDC.TO's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.14% | 3.96% | 4.48% | 4.77% | 4.24% | 3.65% | 5.07% | 4.33% | 5.12% | 4.23% | 3.77% | 4.39% |
XMV.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF | 2.06% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 2.83% | 2.59% | 2.28% | 3.04% | 2.72% | 3.25% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMV.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMV.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMV.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
XMV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. XMV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XMV.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for XMV.TO and PDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer