XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMU.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF) and ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XMU.TO tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index while ZEQL.TO tracks the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMU.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for ZEQL.TO.

Performance

XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XMU.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 6M: -1.16%
• 1Y: 1.98%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: 8.15%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

ZEQL.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XMU.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF	3.37%
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)	7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XMU.TO and ZEQL.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMU.TO

XMU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 11
XMU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XMU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XMU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XMU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XMU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMU.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMU.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	2.01	-1.02

Drawdowns

XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMU.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, which is greater than ZEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMU.TO and ZEQL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMU.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.31%	-6.12%	-21.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.95%	-0.58%	-3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-1.69%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XMU.TO	ZEQL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.20%	12.92%	-3.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.15%	12.92%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.97%	12.92%	+1.05%

XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQL.TO's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMU.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than ZEQL.TO's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XMU.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF	1.12%	1.10%	1.14%	1.33%	1.10%	1.00%	1.59%	1.36%	1.39%	1.51%	1.73%	1.35%
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMU.TO and ZEQL.TO in my portfolio?

XMU.TO and ZEQL.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMU.TO or ZEQL.TO?

On fees, ZEQL.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMU.TO or ZEQL.TO?

ZEQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XMU.TO.

What is the main difference between XMU.TO and ZEQL.TO?

XMU.TO tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while ZEQL.TO tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XMU.TO and 0.05% for ZEQL.TO.