PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMOV.DE achieves a 27.31% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDT.DE's 24.09% return.


XMOV.DE

1D
-2.17%
1M
9.88%
YTD
27.31%
6M
25.74%
1Y
51.46%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*

ZPDT.DE

1D
-2.28%
1M
13.81%
YTD
24.09%
6M
23.15%
1Y
49.52%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
22.38%
10Y*
24.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMOV.DE
Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF
27.31%14.79%20.92%46.97%-25.82%22.52%13.89%9.99%
ZPDT.DE
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
24.09%11.31%29.30%52.02%-25.52%47.48%30.46%38.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XMOV.DE and ZPDT.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.71

The correlation between XMOV.DE and ZPDT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMOV.DE
XMOV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDT.DE
ZPDT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMOV.DEZPDT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

3.19

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.12

8.35

+8.77

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMOV.DE and ZPDT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMOV.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.43

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.99

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.03

-0.27

Drawdowns

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMOV.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than ZPDT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMOV.DE and ZPDT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMOV.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-31.48%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-15.47%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.70%

-29.50%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.32%

-29.50%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-3.09%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-5.68%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

5.91%

-2.91%

Volatility

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE) at 7.06%. This indicates that XMOV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPDT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMOV.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

7.06%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

14.78%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

20.30%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

22.33%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

21.38%

-0.61%

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMOV.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMOV.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMOV.DE nor ZPDT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMOV.DE and ZPDT.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMOV.DE.

XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility, while ZPDT.DE tracks S&P Technology Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMOV.DE and 0.15% for ZPDT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMOV.DE and ZPDT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer