XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE
XMOV.DE (Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF) and WELL.DE (Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both Technology Equities funds - XMOV.DE tracks the Nasdaq Global Future Mobility while WELL.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMOV.DE returned 23.71%/yr vs 26.09%/yr for WELL.DE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMOV.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELL.DE.
Performance
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMOV.DE achieves a 25.87% return, which is significantly higher than WELL.DE's 16.86% return.
XMOV.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 25.87%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 49.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- —
WELL.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF | 25.87% | 14.79% | 20.92% | 46.97% | -10.37% |
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 16.86% | 9.77% | 38.81% | 57.34% | -8.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMOV.DE and WELL.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022 | 0.71 |
The correlation between XMOV.DE and WELL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMOV.DE
WELL.DE
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMOV.DE | WELL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.28 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 2.18 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 5.49 | +9.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMOV.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, which is greater than WELL.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMOV.DE and WELL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMOV.DE | WELL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.78% | -28.78% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -16.18% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.70% | -28.78% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -6.22% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -4.75% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 6.44% | -3.25% |
Volatility
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) at 7.69%. This indicates that XMOV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMOV.DE | WELL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 7.69% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.70% | 15.47% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.29% | 20.98% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 22.43% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 22.43% | -1.10% |
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMOV.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WELL.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMOV.DE vs. WELL.DE - Dividend Comparison
XMOV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 0.28% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.14% |
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMOV.DE and WELL.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELL.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELL.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMOV.DE.
XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility, while WELL.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMOV.DE and 0.18% for WELL.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMOV.DE and WELL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer