XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE
XMOV.DE (Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF) and LTUG.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - XMOV.DE tracks the Nasdaq Global Future Mobility while LTUG.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMOV.DE returned 13.99%/yr vs 9.07%/yr for LTUG.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMOV.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LTUG.DE.
Performance
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMOV.DE having a 27.31% return and LTUG.DE slightly lower at 26.55%.
XMOV.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 6M
- 25.09%
- 1Y
- 51.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- —
LTUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 13.44%
- YTD
- 26.55%
- 6M
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF | 27.31% | 14.79% | 20.92% | 46.97% | -25.82% | 22.52% | 13.89% | 9.99% |
LTUG.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc | 26.55% | 4.10% | 6.60% | 30.68% | -26.76% | 34.20% | 14.21% | 26.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMOV.DE and LTUG.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XMOV.DE and LTUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMOV.DE
LTUG.DE
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc (LTUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMOV.DE | LTUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 1.70 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.12 | 4.42 | +12.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMOV.DE | LTUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 1.10 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.37 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.46 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMOV.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum LTUG.DE drawdown of -61.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMOV.DE and LTUG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMOV.DE | LTUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -61.39% | +26.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -14.90% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.70% | -23.99% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -40.21% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | 0.00% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -14.85% | +7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 5.75% | -2.75% |
Volatility
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Acc (LTUG.DE) at 8.18%. This indicates that XMOV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMOV.DE | LTUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 8.18% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 19.11% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 23.19% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 25.16% | -5.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 25.26% | -4.49% |
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMOV.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LTUG.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMOV.DE vs. LTUG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMOV.DE nor LTUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMOV.DE and LTUG.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LTUG.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LTUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMOV.DE.
XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility, while LTUG.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMOV.DE and 0.30% for LTUG.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMOV.DE and LTUG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer