XMMO vs. SOXQ
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMMO returned 32.10%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 8.02% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and SOXQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XMMO and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
SOXQ
Industrials
-
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Technology
XMMO
SOXQ
Energy
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Utilities
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
XMMO
SOXQ
Communication Services
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
SOXQ
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.72 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 11.73 | -7.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.21 | 45.01 | -26.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 5.43 | -3.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.98 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -46.01% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -15.59% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -39.36% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -12.96% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 4.06% | -2.02% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 7.82%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 13.44% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 26.70% | -11.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 33.78% | -15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 36.38% | -14.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 36.38% | -14.11% |
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 32.10% for XMMO. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 32.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer