PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. PTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 77.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has underperformed PTF with an annualized return of 19.73%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively higher 26.93% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%

PTF

1D
0.27%
1M
19.05%
YTD
77.58%
6M
74.93%
1Y
109.08%
3Y*
43.28%
5Y*
23.79%
10Y*
26.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
77.58%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and PTF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.79

The correlation between XMMO and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMMO vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
PTF

Industrials

41.1%
1.8%

Technology

16.7%
92.9%

Energy

7.7%
1.6%

Basic Materials

7.2%

-

Healthcare

6.3%

-

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Utilities

5.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%

-

Financial Services

2.4%
1.4%

Communication Services

1.6%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Industrials

XMMO
41.1%
PTF
1.8%

Technology

XMMO
16.7%
PTF
92.9%

Energy

XMMO
7.7%
PTF
1.6%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.2%
PTF

-

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
PTF

-

Real Estate

XMMO
6.1%
PTF

-

Utilities

XMMO
5.8%
PTF

-

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
PTF

-

Financial Services

XMMO
2.4%
PTF
1.4%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.6%
PTF
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
PTF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOPTFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.86

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.15

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

6.10

-1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.21

24.27

-6.06

XMMO vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOPTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.86

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.68

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.82

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, roughly equal to the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and PTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOPTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-55.38%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-17.99%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-36.11%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-44.88%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-44.88%

+8.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-13.27%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

4.51%

-2.47%

Volatility

XMMO vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 7.82%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOPTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

13.27%

-5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

29.47%

-13.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

38.39%

-19.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

34.95%

-13.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

32.94%

-10.67%

XMMO vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and PTF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs PTF's -55.38%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.93% vs 19.73% for XMMO. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 19.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.60% for PTF.

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and PTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer