XMMO vs. AVUV
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. XMMO is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMMO returned 16.69%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for AVUV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
XMMO vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly higher than AVUV's 17.96% return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 4.77% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.96% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and AVUV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XMMO and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMMO vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
AVUV
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
AVUV
Technology
XMMO
AVUV
Energy
XMMO
AVUV
Basic Materials
XMMO
AVUV
Healthcare
XMMO
AVUV
Real Estate
XMMO
AVUV
Utilities
XMMO
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
AVUV
Financial Services
XMMO
AVUV
Communication Services
XMMO
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
AVUV
XMMO vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 2.10 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 3.02 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 4.61 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.21 | 13.69 | +4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.10 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.47 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -49.42% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -7.95% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -28.79% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -28.79% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.12% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -7.95% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.67% | -0.63% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 4.08% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 11.34% | +4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 17.54% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 22.74% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 28.30% | -6.03% |
XMMO vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and AVUV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.69% vs 10.71% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer