XMMO vs. AMID
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while AMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Argent. XMMO is passively managed, while AMID is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMMO returned 31.04%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for AMID. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for AMID.
Performance
XMMO vs. AMID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly higher than AMID's 6.47% return.
XMMO
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 20.25%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 20.13%
AMID
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- 9.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO vs. AMID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.90% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -9.01% |
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 6.47% | -1.39% | 13.06% | 31.26% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and AMID is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between XMMO and AMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMMO vs. AMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
AMID
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
XMMO
AMID
Technology
XMMO
AMID
Basic Materials
XMMO
AMID
Energy
XMMO
AMID
Healthcare
XMMO
AMID
Utilities
XMMO
AMID
Real Estate
XMMO
AMID
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
AMID
Financial Services
XMMO
AMID
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
AMID
Communication Services
XMMO
AMID
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. AMID — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
AMID
XMMO vs. AMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | AMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 0.77 | +3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.07 | 2.66 | +14.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. AMID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than AMID's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and AMID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | AMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -23.32% | -32.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -12.31% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -23.32% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -4.40% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -6.18% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 3.55% | -1.45% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. AMID - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) at 5.45%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | AMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 5.45% | +3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 12.67% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 16.59% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 19.13% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 19.13% | +3.20% |
XMMO vs. AMID - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMID's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. AMID - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than AMID's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.57% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and AMID have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to AMID (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs AMID's -23.32%.
On 3-year performance, XMMO leads with 31.04% vs 11.94% for AMID. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AMID has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 31.04% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.34% for AMID.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while AMID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.52% for AMID.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and AMID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer