XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and XUHC.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while XUHC.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMME.DE returned 7.00%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for XUHC.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMME.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUHC.DE.

Performance

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than XUHC.DE's 7.46% return.

XMME.DE

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: -8.18%
• 6M: 11.33%
• YTD: 20.01%
• 1Y: 33.43%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: —

XUHC.DE

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 8.40%
• 6M: 5.67%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 1Y: 24.55%
• 3Y*: 7.74%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	20.01%	18.69%	13.82%	5.89%	-15.00%	4.75%	6.58%	21.91%	-11.16%	5.52%
XUHC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D	7.46%	1.47%	8.80%	-1.46%	2.49%	36.78%	3.35%	24.43%	9.06%	-16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XMME.DE and XUHC.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017	0.34

The correlation between XMME.DE and XUHC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMME.DE

XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XUHC.DE

XUHC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
XUHC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XUHC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XUHC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
XUHC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XUHC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMME.DE	XUHC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.61	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.43	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	2.19	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	5.37	+3.94

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the XUHC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMME.DE and XUHC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, which is greater than XUHC.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and XUHC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMME.DE	XUHC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.95%	-26.86%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-11.18%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.16%	-22.18%	+3.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.46%	-22.18%	-1.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.00%	-1.53%	-9.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-6.32%	-3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	4.56%	-0.98%

Volatility

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE) at 5.34%. This indicates that XMME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUHC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMME.DE	XUHC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.51%	5.34%	+3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.91%	11.00%	+6.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.34%	15.17%	+5.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	14.59%	+2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.07%	17.07%	+2.00%

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XUHC.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMME.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMME.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUHC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUHC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D	1.17%	1.29%	1.21%	1.22%	1.63%	0.82%	1.13%	0.96%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMME.DE and XUHC.DE in my portfolio?

XMME.DE and XUHC.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMME.DE or XUHC.DE?

On fees, XUHC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMME.DE or XUHC.DE?

XUHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.

What is the main difference between XMME.DE and XUHC.DE?

XMME.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XUHC.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while XUHC.DE tracks MSCI USA Health Care. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.12% for XUHC.DE.