XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE
XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and XGLF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Xtrackers - XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets while XGLF.DE tracks the MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMME.DE returned 7.00%/yr vs 5.07%/yr for XGLF.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMME.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XGLF.DE.
Performance
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than XGLF.DE's 4.58% return.
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 1Y
- 33.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- —
XGLF.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 20.01% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.58% | 21.91% | -11.16% | -2.35% |
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 4.58% | -5.36% | 9.58% | 0.55% | 1.24% | 48.84% | -9.49% | 9.50% | 22.95% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMME.DE and XGLF.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMME.DE
XGLF.DE
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMME.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.05 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 0.28 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 0.60 | +8.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, smaller than the maximum XGLF.DE drawdown of -42.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and XGLF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMME.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.95% | -42.15% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -9.05% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -18.41% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.46% | -31.29% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | -18.93% | +7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -18.25% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 4.18% | -0.60% |
Volatility
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) at 3.12%. This indicates that XMME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMME.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 3.12% | +5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 9.08% | +8.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.34% | 12.57% | +7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.37% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 18.33% | +0.74% |
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XGLF.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMME.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMME.DE nor XGLF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMME.DE and XGLF.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and XGLF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer