XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE
XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and IBCI.DE (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while IBCI.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMME.DE returned 8.16%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IBCI.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMME.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IBCI.DE.
Performance
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than IBCI.DE's 3.01% return.
XMME.DE
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 26.82%
- 6M
- 28.91%
- 1Y
- 47.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 2.99%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 26.82% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.58% | 21.91% | -11.16% | -2.35% |
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 3.01% | 0.81% | -0.17% | 5.41% | -9.30% | 6.19% | 2.83% | 6.31% | -1.54% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMME.DE and IBCI.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017 | 0.12 |
The correlation between XMME.DE and IBCI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMME.DE
IBCI.DE
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMME.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.11 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 1.23 | +3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.86 | 2.90 | +11.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, which is greater than IBCI.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and IBCI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMME.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.95% | -16.37% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -1.87% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -5.59% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -16.37% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -5.67% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.81% | -3.77% | -6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 0.79% | +2.30% |
Volatility
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) at 1.61%. This indicates that XMME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMME.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 1.61% | +5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.90% | 3.00% | +12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 3.82% | +14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 6.86% | +10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 6.16% | +12.76% |
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCI.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMME.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMME.DE nor IBCI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMME.DE and IBCI.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.
XMME.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IBCI.DE is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.09% for IBCI.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and IBCI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer