XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE
XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and AXQE.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets while AXQE.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMME.DE returned 48.38% vs 59.71% for AXQE.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMME.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for AXQE.DE.
Performance
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 29.71% return, which is significantly lower than AXQE.DE's 36.40% return.
XMME.DE
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 6M
- 30.46%
- 1Y
- 48.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
AXQE.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 36.40%
- 6M
- 37.91%
- 1Y
- 59.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 29.71% | 17.99% |
AXQE.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating | 36.40% | 32.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMME.DE and AXQE.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XMME.DE and AXQE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMME.DE
AXQE.DE
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMME.DE | AXQE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 3.03 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.47 | 11.84 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, which is greater than AXQE.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and AXQE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMME.DE | AXQE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.95% | -19.63% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -19.63% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -5.77% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -2.63% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 5.03% | -1.91% |
Volatility
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) is 8.81%, while AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that XMME.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXQE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMME.DE | AXQE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.81% | 10.08% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.93% | 31.66% | -14.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 33.64% | -14.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 32.03% | -14.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 32.03% | -13.04% |
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AXQE.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMME.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMME.DE nor AXQE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMME.DE and AXQE.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for AXQE.DE.
XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while AXQE.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.30% for AXQE.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and AXQE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer