XMM.TO vs. CAEM.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMM.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF) and CAEM.TO (Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. XMM.TO is passively managed, while CAEM.TO is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

XMM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF (CAEM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XMM.TO

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 9.35%
• YTD: 18.98%
• 6M: 17.95%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

CAEM.TO

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 9.77%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XMM.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF	16.38%
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF	17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XMM.TO and CAEM.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

XMM.TO vs. CAEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMM.TO

XMM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 69
XMM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XMM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
XMM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XMM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
XMM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF (CAEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMM.TO	CAEM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMM.TO	CAEM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	7.86	-7.31

Drawdowns

XMM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMM.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, which is greater than CAEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMM.TO and CAEM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMM.TO	CAEM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-4.26%	-17.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.87%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-0.74%	-4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XMM.TO	CAEM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	19.42%	-6.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.40%	19.42%	-9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.02%	19.42%	-7.40%

Dividends

XMM.TO vs. CAEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while CAEM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMM.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF	2.00%	2.37%	2.95%	2.55%	1.55%	1.91%	2.09%	2.44%	2.21%	2.09%	2.32%	2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMM.TO and CAEM.TO in my portfolio?

XMM.TO and CAEM.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between XMM.TO and CAEM.TO?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and CIBC.