XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE
XMLH.DE (L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc) and CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XMLH.DE tracks the ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index while CBUF.DE tracks the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLH.DE returned -2.65%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for CBUF.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMLH.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CBUF.DE.
Performance
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLH.DE achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than CBUF.DE's 3.57% return.
XMLH.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 37.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- —
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLH.DE L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc | 8.53% | 11.69% | 8.01% | -4.50% | -29.19% | 7.76% | 49.95% | 11.10% |
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 3.57% | 2.50% | 0.82% | 0.27% | 2.07% | 30.41% | 2.88% | 11.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLH.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XMLH.DE and CBUF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMLH.DE
CBUF.DE
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (XMLH.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMLH.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 1.65 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 4.12 | +1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLH.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than CBUF.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLH.DE and CBUF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLH.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -25.79% | -25.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.46% | -10.72% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -21.80% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.58% | -21.80% | -28.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.16% | -4.29% | -16.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.17% | -5.64% | -19.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 4.31% | +2.60% |
Volatility
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (XMLH.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) at 4.99%. This indicates that XMLH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLH.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 4.99% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 10.41% | +5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 14.49% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 13.79% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 15.41% | +8.38% |
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLH.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUF.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLH.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison
XMLH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.26% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 0.10% |
XMLH.DE L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLH.DE and CBUF.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLH.DE.
XMLH.DE tracks ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLH.DE and 0.18% for CBUF.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMLH.DE and CBUF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer