PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMLD.DE having a 42.18% return and RENW.DE slightly higher at 43.00%.


XMLD.DE

1D
-0.78%
1M
20.65%
YTD
42.18%
6M
39.73%
1Y
73.37%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*

RENW.DE

1D
-1.77%
1M
4.66%
YTD
43.00%
6M
41.09%
1Y
80.00%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XMLD.DE
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
42.18%16.99%25.17%54.28%-36.45%19.09%9.25%
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
43.00%35.27%-9.64%-11.30%-3.32%1.09%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLD.DE and RENW.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.64

The correlation between XMLD.DE and RENW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLD.DE
XMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

RENW.DE
RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMLD.DERENW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.56

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

9.22

-4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.52

34.50

-21.98

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLD.DE and RENW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMLD.DERENW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

3.49

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.41

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.49

+0.33

Drawdowns

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, roughly equal to the maximum RENW.DE drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLD.DE and RENW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLD.DERENW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-43.93%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.80%

-8.63%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.67%

-35.00%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.81%

-42.30%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-3.64%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-17.33%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

2.31%

+3.53%

Volatility

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) at 8.24%. This indicates that XMLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RENW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMLD.DERENW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.34%

8.24%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.89%

16.85%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

22.80%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.22%

22.02%

+5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.52%

22.48%

+6.04%

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMLD.DE and RENW.DE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

XMLD.DE vs. RENW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLD.DE nor RENW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMLD.DE and RENW.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMLD.DE and RENW.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

XMLD.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while RENW.DE is Energy Equities. XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while RENW.DE tracks Solactive Clean Energy.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMLD.DE and RENW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer