PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
20.87%35.27%-9.64%-16.06%
XDG7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C
15.64%23.57%-15.19%-25.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RENW.DE achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly higher than XDG7.DE's 15.64% return.


RENW.DE

1D
3.38%
1M
3.89%
YTD
20.87%
6M
29.61%
1Y
71.48%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*

XDG7.DE

1D
1.45%
1M
2.16%
YTD
15.64%
6M
23.47%
1Y
51.50%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RENW.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XDG7.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RENW.DE
RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XDG7.DE
XDG7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RENW.DEXDG7.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.88

1.66

+1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

2.38

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

2.99

+3.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

27.27

7.49

+19.78

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RENW.DE and XDG7.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RENW.DEXDG7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

1.66

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

-0.13

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between RENW.DE and XDG7.DE is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RENW.DE nor XDG7.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RENW.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, smaller than the maximum XDG7.DE drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.DE and XDG7.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RENW.DEXDG7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.93%

-48.68%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-17.21%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.93%

+10.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-27.85%

+10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

6.87%

-4.28%

Volatility

RENW.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) at 4.85%. This indicates that RENW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDG7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RENW.DEXDG7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

4.85%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.88%

26.68%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.68%

30.97%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

24.15%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.39%

24.15%

-1.76%