XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) and ETLX.DE (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLC.DE is a Water Equities fund tracking the Solactive Clean Water, while ETLX.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DAXglobal® Gold Miners. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLC.DE returned 6.47%/yr vs 23.41%/yr for ETLX.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMLC.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ETLX.DE.

Performance

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLC.DE achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than ETLX.DE's -2.30% return.

XMLC.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: —

ETLX.DE

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: -2.30%
• 6M: 5.48%
• 1Y: 61.20%
• 3Y*: 46.63%
• 5Y*: 23.41%
• 10Y*: 15.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	2.11%	3.88%	9.96%	17.08%	-12.64%	37.15%	7.97%	11.56%
ETLX.DE L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF	-2.30%	152.55%	27.41%	11.05%	-7.10%	-3.32%	12.25%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLC.DE and ETLX.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019	0.21

Return for Risk

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLC.DE

XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

ETLX.DE

ETLX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 37
ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ETLX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
ETLX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ETLX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ETLX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMLC.DE	ETLX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.33	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.81	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.23	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	2.11	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	5.29	-3.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLC.DE and ETLX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMLC.DE	ETLX.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	1.33	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.64	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.23	+0.34

Drawdowns

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, smaller than the maximum ETLX.DE drawdown of -73.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLC.DE and ETLX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMLC.DE	ETLX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.25%	-73.44%	+38.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-28.89%	+17.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-28.89%	+9.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	-42.03%	+21.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.57%	-24.71%	+17.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-34.69%	+28.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	11.52%	-7.24%

Volatility

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) is 4.03%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that XMLC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETLX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMLC.DE	ETLX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	14.03%	-10.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.79%	35.22%	-24.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.11%	45.70%	-31.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	36.04%	-20.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	33.83%	-15.17%

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ETLX.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMLC.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLC.DE nor ETLX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMLC.DE and ETLX.DE in my portfolio?

XMLC.DE and ETLX.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMLC.DE or ETLX.DE?

On fees, XMLC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMLC.DE or ETLX.DE?

XMLC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ETLX.DE.

What is the main difference between XMLC.DE and ETLX.DE?

XMLC.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while ETLX.DE is Precious Metals. XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water, while ETLX.DE tracks DAXglobal® Gold Miners. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLC.DE and 0.65% for ETLX.DE.