PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLC.DE achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than ENTR.DE's 12.78% return.


XMLC.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
2.11%
6M
1.67%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*

ENTR.DE

1D
-0.84%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.78%
6M
23.00%
1Y
37.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMLC.DE
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF
2.11%3.88%6.95%
ENTR.DE
L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
12.78%17.08%-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLC.DE and ENTR.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024

0.12

The correlation between XMLC.DE and ENTR.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLC.DE
XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ENTR.DE
ENTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ENTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMLC.DEENTR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.41

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.86

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

13.56

-11.96

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the ENTR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLC.DE and ENTR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMLC.DEENTR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.27

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.92

-0.36

Drawdowns

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLC.DE and ENTR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLC.DEENTR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.25%

-14.17%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-9.72%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-2.59%

-4.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-5.85%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

2.77%

+1.51%

Volatility

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) is 4.03%, while L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that XMLC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMLC.DEENTR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.62%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

13.78%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

16.50%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.02%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

15.02%

+3.64%

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMLC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLC.DE nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMLC.DE and ENTR.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMLC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMLC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.

XMLC.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while ENTR.DE is Commodities. XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLC.DE and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMLC.DE and ENTR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer