XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE
XMKA.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMKA.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EFM Africa Top 50 Capped Index, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMKA.DE returned 6.25%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for XNAS.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMKA.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMKA.DE achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 19.10% return.
XMKA.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 3.73%
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMKA.DE Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.44% | 36.20% | 10.13% | -6.42% | -6.03% | 8.07% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.10% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 31.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMKA.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMKA.DE
XNAS.DE
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMKA.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.33 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 9.64 | -6.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMKA.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMKA.DE and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMKA.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -31.25% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.24% | -10.00% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.24% | -26.72% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -31.25% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.25% | -2.56% | -6.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -7.75% | -14.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 3.45% | +3.17% |
Volatility
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMKA.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 6.66% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.08% | 12.34% | +4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 16.97% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 20.06% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 19.92% | +1.79% |
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMKA.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMKA.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMKA.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMKA.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMKA.DE.
XMKA.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XMKA.DE tracks MSCI EFM Africa Top 50 Capped Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMKA.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMKA.DE and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer