XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XMKA.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMKA.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EFM Africa Top 50 Capped Index, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMKA.DE returned 3.73%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMKA.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMKA.DE achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, XMKA.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 3.73%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.
XMKA.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 3.73%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMKA.DE Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.44% | 36.20% | 10.13% | -6.42% | -6.03% | 12.80% | -15.94% | 13.45% | -15.31% | 10.09% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMKA.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2011 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XMKA.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMKA.DE
XDWH.DE
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMKA.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 2.24 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 5.74 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMKA.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMKA.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMKA.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -40.65% | -10.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.24% | -9.82% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.24% | -21.11% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -21.11% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | -26.06% | -21.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.25% | -0.35% | -8.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -7.34% | -14.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 3.83% | +2.79% |
Volatility
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.52%. This indicates that XMKA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMKA.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 4.52% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.08% | 10.23% | +6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 14.17% | +5.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 13.51% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 15.62% | +6.09% |
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMKA.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMKA.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMKA.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMKA.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMKA.DE.
XMKA.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XMKA.DE tracks MSCI EFM Africa Top 50 Capped Index, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMKA.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMKA.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer