PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMKA.DE achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than XDEW.DE's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, XMKA.DE has underperformed XDEW.DE with an annualized return of 2.94%, while XDEW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.


XMKA.DE

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.10%
6M
-7.74%
YTD
-1.31%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
2.94%

XDEW.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.32%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMKA.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.31%36.20%10.13%-6.42%-6.03%12.80%-15.94%13.45%-15.31%10.09%
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
14.50%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-6.94%41.59%1.18%31.27%-4.53%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XMKA.DE and XDEW.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between XMKA.DE and XDEW.DE has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMKA.DE
XMKA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XMKA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMKA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMKA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XMKA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMKA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMKA.DEXDEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.35

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

3.91

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

12.05

-9.88

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMKA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMKA.DE and XDEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMKA.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than XDEW.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMKA.DE and XDEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMKA.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-38.79%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.24%

-5.06%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.24%

-22.70%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-22.70%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-38.79%

-8.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-0.61%

-10.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.00%

-5.33%

-16.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

1.65%

+5.23%

Volatility

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) at 2.81%. This indicates that XMKA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMKA.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

2.81%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

6.82%

+10.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

10.43%

+9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

14.90%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

16.80%

+4.86%

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMKA.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMKA.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMKA.DE nor XDEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMKA.DE and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMKA.DE.

XMKA.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. XMKA.DE tracks MSCI EFM Africa Top 50 Capped Index, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMKA.DE and 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMKA.DE and XDEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer