XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE
XMKA.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LGQM.DE (Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XMKA.DE tracks the MSCI EFM Africa Top 50 Capped Index while LGQM.DE tracks the SGI Pan Africa Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMKA.DE returned 2.94%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for LGQM.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMKA.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for LGQM.DE.
Performance
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMKA.DE achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly higher than LGQM.DE's -3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XMKA.DE has underperformed LGQM.DE with an annualized return of 2.94%, while LGQM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.70% annualized return.
XMKA.DE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- 6M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
LGQM.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- 6M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMKA.DE Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.31% | 36.20% | 10.13% | -6.42% | -6.03% | 12.80% | -15.94% | 13.45% | -15.31% | 10.09% |
LGQM.DE Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) | -3.64% | 51.40% | 12.14% | -3.16% | -5.95% | 9.29% | -6.21% | 12.09% | -16.43% | 10.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMKA.DE and LGQM.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between XMKA.DE and LGQM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMKA.DE
LGQM.DE
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) and Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMKA.DE | LGQM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.41 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | 3.31 | -1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMKA.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, smaller than the maximum LGQM.DE drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMKA.DE and LGQM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMKA.DE | LGQM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -61.98% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.24% | -19.42% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.24% | -19.42% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -24.12% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | -50.35% | +3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -15.95% | +5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.00% | -26.92% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.88% | 8.31% | -1.43% |
Volatility
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Africa Top 50 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XMKA.DE) is 4.67%, while Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that XMKA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGQM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMKA.DE | LGQM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 6.31% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.99% | 27.50% | -10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.10% | 32.16% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 23.79% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 23.12% | -1.46% |
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMKA.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LGQM.DE's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMKA.DE vs. LGQM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMKA.DE nor LGQM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMKA.DE and LGQM.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMKA.DE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMKA.DE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGQM.DE.
XMKA.DE tracks MSCI EFM Africa Top 50 Capped Index, while LGQM.DE tracks SGI Pan Africa Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMKA.DE and 0.85% for LGQM.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMKA.DE and LGQM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer