LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE
LGQM.DE (Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGQM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the SGI Pan Africa Index, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LGQM.DE returned 18.21%/yr vs 59.62%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGQM.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGQM.DE achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.74% return.
LGQM.DE
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 34.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- 6M
- 59.12%
- YTD
- 63.74%
- 1Y
- 110.36%
- 3Y*
- 59.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQM.DE Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.72% | 51.40% | 12.14% | -3.16% | -5.95% | -1.57% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.74% | 32.60% | 66.51% | 74.52% | -34.67% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGQM.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGQM.DE
LSMC.DE
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGQM.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.47 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 8.55 | -6.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 25.57 | -21.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGQM.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQM.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGQM.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -39.64% | -22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -12.84% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.42% | -36.22% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.27% | -7.93% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -11.34% | -15.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 4.30% | +3.50% |
Volatility
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) is 10.16%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that LGQM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGQM.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 14.15% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.65% | 24.88% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 32.91% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 32.56% | -8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 32.56% | -9.44% |
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGQM.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGQM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGQM.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGQM.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. LGQM.DE tracks SGI Pan Africa Index, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGQM.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGQM.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer