XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE
XMK9.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMK9.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMK9.DE returned 19.08%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMK9.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMK9.DE achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
XMK9.DE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 19.57%
- 6M
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 51.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMK9.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged | 19.57% | 27.06% | 22.49% | 33.31% | -6.05% | 11.97% | 7.34% | 17.42% | -16.83% | 12.63% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMK9.DE and XMME.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XMK9.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMK9.DE
XMME.DE
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMK9.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.55 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 4.98 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.91 | 18.04 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMK9.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 3.00 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.51 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.45 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMK9.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMK9.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMK9.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.29% | -31.96% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -10.67% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.74% | -19.16% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -24.38% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.04% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -9.53% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.95% | -0.12% |
Volatility
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE) is 3.68%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XMK9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMK9.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 7.48% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 14.90% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 17.70% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 16.74% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 18.61% | +0.19% |
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMK9.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMK9.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMK9.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMK9.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XMK9.DE.
XMK9.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XMK9.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XMK9.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMK9.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer