XMJP.L vs. S400.L
XMJP.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) and S400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMJP.L returned 10.26%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for S400.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XMJP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for S400.L.
Performance
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMJP.L achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly higher than S400.L's 15.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XMJP.L having a 10.26% annualized return and S400.L not far behind at 9.95%.
XMJP.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 34.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
S400.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 31.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMJP.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 16.45% | 17.49% | 9.14% | 13.88% | -7.09% | 2.11% | 12.34% | 14.37% | -8.64% | 13.19% |
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF | 15.40% | 17.62% | 8.31% | 13.66% | -5.83% | 0.91% | 12.00% | 14.33% | -9.33% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMJP.L and S400.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2014 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XMJP.L and S400.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.97 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMJP.L
S400.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
XMJP.L
S400.L
Technology
XMJP.L
S400.L
Financial Services
XMJP.L
S400.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMJP.L
S400.L
Communication Services
XMJP.L
S400.L
Healthcare
XMJP.L
S400.L
Consumer Defensive
XMJP.L
S400.L
Basic Materials
XMJP.L
S400.L
Real Estate
XMJP.L
S400.L
Utilities
XMJP.L
S400.L
Energy
XMJP.L
S400.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMJP.L vs. S400.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMJP.L
S400.L
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMJP.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.03 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.22 | 9.75 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMJP.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.83 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.63 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.60 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, which is greater than S400.L's maximum drawdown of -24.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMJP.L and S400.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMJP.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.91% | -24.69% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -10.45% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -12.83% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.48% | -19.34% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.22% | -24.69% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.43% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -5.13% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.25% | +0.08% |
Volatility
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) have volatilities of 3.89% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMJP.L | S400.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 3.99% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 14.23% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.08% | 17.33% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 15.38% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.80% | +0.10% |
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMJP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than S400.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMJP.L vs. S400.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMJP.L nor S400.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMJP.L and S400.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S400.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S400.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XMJP.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMJP.L and 0.19% for S400.L.
Find the right allocation for XMJP.L and S400.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer