S400.L vs. EXX7.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE).
S400.L and EXX7.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. S400.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco Investment Management Limited that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Sep 10, 2014. EXX7.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nikkei 225®. It was launched on Jul 5, 2006. Both S400.L and EXX7.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: S400.L or EXX7.DE.
Key characteristics
| S400.L | EXX7.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.56% | 11.79% |
| 1Y Return | 12.32% | 18.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.43% | 2.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.15% | 5.09% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.92% | 8.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.13 | 1.40 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.10 | 1.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.62 | 3.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.45% | 5.58% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.68% | 17.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.69% | -50.57% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.77% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between S400.L and EXX7.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
S400.L vs. EXX7.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, S400.L achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than EXX7.DE's 11.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with S400.L having a 7.92% annualized return and EXX7.DE not far ahead at 8.11%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
S400.L vs. EXX7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
S400.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EXX7.DE's 0.51% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
S400.L vs. EXX7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
S400.L vs. EXX7.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither S400.L nor EXX7.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXX7.DE iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.00% | 0.42% | 1.31% | 0.81% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 0.53% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.29% | 0.86% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
S400.L vs. EXX7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S400.L drawdown since its inception was -24.69%, smaller than the maximum EXX7.DE drawdown of -50.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S400.L and EXX7.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
S400.L vs. EXX7.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) is 4.68%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXX7.DE) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that S400.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXX7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.