PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMJP.L is traded in GBp, while FJPS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FJPS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMJP.L having a 16.45% return and FJPS.L slightly higher at 16.69%.


XMJP.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
6.26%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.56%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
10.26%

FJPS.L

1D
0.27%
1M
7.52%
YTD
16.69%
6M
15.62%
1Y
33.78%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XMJP.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C
16.45%17.49%9.14%13.88%-7.09%2.11%1.75%
FJPS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc
16.69%14.84%8.88%12.32%-5.11%2.90%1.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XMJP.L and FJPS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020

0.96

The correlation between XMJP.L and FJPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMJP.L
FJPS.L

Industrials

26.0%
21.9%

Technology

19.1%
19.8%

Financial Services

17.5%
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
11.4%

Communication Services

7.9%
9.0%

Healthcare

6.3%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.0%

Utilities

1.1%
0.8%

Energy

1.1%
1.8%

Industrials

XMJP.L
26.0%
FJPS.L
21.9%

Technology

XMJP.L
19.1%
FJPS.L
19.8%

Financial Services

XMJP.L
17.5%
FJPS.L
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XMJP.L
12.2%
FJPS.L
11.4%

Communication Services

XMJP.L
7.9%
FJPS.L
9.0%

Healthcare

XMJP.L
6.3%
FJPS.L
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

XMJP.L
3.6%
FJPS.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

XMJP.L
3.0%
FJPS.L
4.0%

Real Estate

XMJP.L
2.3%
FJPS.L
2.0%

Utilities

XMJP.L
1.1%
FJPS.L
0.8%

Energy

XMJP.L
1.1%
FJPS.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMJP.L
XMJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FJPS.L
FJPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FJPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMJP.LFJPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.20

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

10.51

-0.29

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FJPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMJP.L and FJPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMJP.LFJPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.83

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.62

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.59

-0.19

Drawdowns

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, which is greater than FJPS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMJP.L and FJPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMJP.LFJPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.91%

-17.38%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.65%

-10.50%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-15.34%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

-17.38%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-5.17%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.20%

+0.13%

Volatility

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) is 3.89%, while Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that XMJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMJP.LFJPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

4.30%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

15.08%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

18.44%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

16.10%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

15.90%

0.00%

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMJP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FJPS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMJP.L vs. FJPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMJP.L nor FJPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMJP.L and FJPS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMJP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMJP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FJPS.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMJP.L and 0.30% for FJPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMJP.L and FJPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer