PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJPS.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FJPS.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FJPS.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FJPS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc
2.77%14.84%8.88%12.32%-5.11%2.90%1.92%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
10.64%52.02%28.87%7.06%11.03%-3.24%-0.06%
Different Trading Currencies

FJPS.L is traded in GBP, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJPS.L achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 10.64% return.


FJPS.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-9.04%
YTD
2.77%
6M
7.25%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

GLD

1D
3.49%
1M
-9.30%
YTD
10.64%
6M
23.12%
1Y
45.90%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FJPS.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FJPS.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPS.L
FJPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FJPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPS.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJPS.LGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.78

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

2.23

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.70

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.91

10.37

-3.46

FJPS.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJPS.L and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJPS.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.78

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.38

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.70

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between FJPS.L and GLD is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FJPS.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FJPS.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FJPS.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPS.L and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPS.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-45.56%

+28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-19.21%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.38%

-21.03%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.04%

-13.23%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-16.17%

+10.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

5.20%

-2.10%

Volatility

FJPS.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) is 9.17%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 11.31%. This indicates that FJPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FJPS.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.17%

11.31%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.13%

23.24%

-9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

25.92%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

16.54%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

16.23%

-0.56%