PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMH.TO (iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XMH.TO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400® CAD Hedged Index, while XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMH.TO returned 9.24%/yr vs 19.70%/yr for XQQ.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMH.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XQQ.TO.

Performance

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMH.TO achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly lower than XQQ.TO's 19.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XMH.TO has underperformed XQQ.TO with an annualized return of 9.24%, while XQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.

XMH.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.81%
YTD
12.86%
6M
12.86%
1Y
22.40%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
9.24%

XQQ.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
10.58%
YTD
19.81%
6M
18.06%
1Y
38.49%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
19.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMH.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		12.86%5.45%12.05%15.06%-14.93%21.83%10.06%24.77%-13.79%15.70%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		19.81%18.38%24.23%52.23%-33.67%22.29%45.23%37.48%-2.33%31.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XMH.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2015

0.64

The correlation between XMH.TO and XQQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XMH.TO
XQQ.TO

Industrials

25.6%
3.1%

Technology

17.1%
53.7%

Financial Services

13.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
12.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
4.2%

Real Estate

7.5%
0.1%

Energy

5.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
7.7%

Utilities

3.0%
1.4%

Communication Services

1.0%
15.8%

Industrials

XMH.TO
25.6%
XQQ.TO
3.1%

Technology

XMH.TO
17.1%
XQQ.TO
53.7%

Financial Services

XMH.TO
13.8%
XQQ.TO
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XMH.TO
9.7%
XQQ.TO
12.2%

Healthcare

XMH.TO
8.9%
XQQ.TO
4.2%

Real Estate

XMH.TO
7.5%
XQQ.TO
0.1%

Energy

XMH.TO
5.2%
XQQ.TO
0.6%

Basic Materials

XMH.TO
5.0%
XQQ.TO
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

XMH.TO
4.1%
XQQ.TO
7.7%

Utilities

XMH.TO
3.0%
XQQ.TO
1.4%

Communication Services

XMH.TO
1.0%
XQQ.TO
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XMH.TO:
XMH.TO vs. XMHQXMH.TO vs. VOTXMH.TO vs. VFV.TOXMH.TO vs. XEF.TOXMH.TO vs. USMVXMH.TO vs. XMD.TOXMH.TO vs. XSU.TO
Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO

Return for Risk

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMH.TO
XMH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMH.TOXQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.42
2.45

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.12
3.20

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.03

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

11.31

-2.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMH.TO and XQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMH.TOXQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.45

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.68

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.89

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.86

-0.45

Drawdowns

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMH.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, which is greater than XQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMH.TO and XQQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMH.TOXQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.82%

-38.55%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-12.76%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-22.72%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-38.55%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.82%

-38.55%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.27%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-5.92%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.41%

-0.88%

Volatility

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) is 4.16%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that XMH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMH.TOXQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.48%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

12.00%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

15.82%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

22.52%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

22.34%

-1.38%

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMH.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.21% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMH.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.98%1.10%1.03%1.16%1.30%0.91%1.02%1.35%1.39%0.88%1.52%0.63%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.21%0.25%0.32%0.31%0.43%0.17%0.26%0.46%0.52%0.53%0.76%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XMH.TO and XQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMH.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMH.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

XMH.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XMH.TO tracks S&P MidCap 400® CAD Hedged Index, while XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XMH.TO and 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMH.TO and XQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer