XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO).
XMH.TO and XEF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400® CAD Hedged Index. It was launched on Aug 4, 2015. XEF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2013. Both XMH.TO and XEF.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMH.TO or XEF.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XMH.TO and XEF.TO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XMH.TO:
0.91
XEF.TO:
1.63
XMH.TO:
1.37
XEF.TO:
2.25
XMH.TO:
1.17
XEF.TO:
1.28
XMH.TO:
1.58
XEF.TO:
2.77
XMH.TO:
3.72
XEF.TO:
8.39
XMH.TO:
3.81%
XEF.TO:
2.07%
XMH.TO:
15.58%
XEF.TO:
10.69%
XMH.TO:
-44.82%
XEF.TO:
-28.51%
XMH.TO:
-6.11%
XEF.TO:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMH.TO achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than XEF.TO's 6.43% return.
XMH.TO
2.55%
-0.14%
5.99%
12.22%
8.17%
N/A
XEF.TO
6.43%
6.28%
6.96%
16.82%
7.49%
6.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMH.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XEF.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XMH.TO
XEF.TO
XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than XEF.TO's 2.59% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMH.TO iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.30% | 0.91% | 1.02% | 1.35% | 1.39% | 0.88% | 1.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 2.59% | 2.76% | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.42% | 1.93% | 2.72% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.42% | 2.42% | 5.21% |
Drawdowns
XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMH.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, which is greater than XEF.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMH.TO and XEF.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) at 2.98%. This indicates that XMH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.